The Rococo Fallacy

This is a post I’ve wanted to get out of my system for a long, long time, but I feared the backlash. I’ve seen recently, however, that there are other people who feel the same, so I think it’s time for me to do this.
32432423
Many people have heard the line “Lolita Fashion is influenced by the Rococo era”. With places like Rococo Soul, Sweet Rococo (now closed), and many Lolita pieces that are named, or include the term “Rococo” in their name, it’s easy to believe this if you’re not a history buff. It’s been in documentaries, some pick it up from Kamikaze Girls, even seasoned and e-famous Lolitas who should know better have made the claim while trying to educate people on the fashion, and frankly, I’m disappointed, because it’s very much not. Not one bit. At least, not originally. 
34324323432This is the part that Lolitas seem to have overlooked for years. When Novala Takemoto was talking about Momoko’s love for Rococo, he wasn’t talking about her clothes, he was talking about her lifestyle. She wears Lolita because it’s frilly and decadent, and she wants to dedicate her life to loving clothes. This doesn’t invalidate Kamikaze Girls as a source for inspiration at all, since the divide between her self-indulgent Rococo lifestyle and her modern Lolita clothing is quite obvious. It’s actually amazing that Lolitas misunderstood this so completely, especially considering that Rococo era clothing bears no resemblance to standard Lolita Fashion at all, and early Lolita developed from Natural Kei, Otome, and other sources (but that’s another post for another time).
452Even someone previously unfamiliar with both styles can see that they’re completely different. I’ve pointed out a few things, but it hardly needs to be done, they’re worlds apart and the followers of both dress(ed) with very different ideals in mind.
While you could argue that because Lolita brands started slapping the “Rococo” label on things, and because they did it as far back as 2001, that it’s legit, but the garments still bear absolutely no likeness to Rococo.

To claim that Rococo is the main influence for Lolita erases its history as a subculture and street fashion, and frankly, it’s annoying to have people try to force it. It doesn’t help that the OTT Classic trend makes it more believable to those unfamiliar with the actual Rococo period, since people are wearing underskirts to lengthen dresses, and adding fancier, less Lolita headdresses and accessories. You know what, though? It still doesn’t look a thing like Rococo!

It’s really time for people to stop using the term and acknowledge the roots of the fashion, especially those who are very vocal about it and who have an influential role in the global community. I’ve needed to get this out of my system for so long, because it just doesn’t make any sense. Why cop out with a false history when the real one is so much more interesting and rich?

For those interested in the early development of the fashion, FYeahLolita has a great post about it here: http://fyeahlolita.blogspot.ie/2010/02/old-school-lolita-in-90s-80s-and-70s.html

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The Rococo Fallacy

  1. Okami Kotori says:

    Did you also listen to the Japanese version of what she’s saying? I’m not really an expert in Japanese language, but if she said something in the lines of “naritai” that that would mean she would want to become like the rococo, which would mean she wanted more than just a luxury lifestyle, but that particular lifestyle. You should also keep in mind that a lifestyle does include clothing. I also think it’s more of an aesthetic thing than actual copying of the style. Lolita’s want to be that cute and refined lady, like in the lady’s of the rococo era. So they modified the clothing to fit modern era, higher skirt, because, lets be real; your beatiful dress touching the ground in Tokyo? nahah,, Rococo is also not the only influence credited for the influence of lolita fashion, so that’s where the other aspects probably came from.

    That’s what I think at least.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s